Anti-Docking Dogs' Tails and Cropping of Dogs' Ears - puppy sales and health
Anti-Docking Alliance (A.D.A.)
Campaign to end the docking of dogs' tails (and cropping of ears)

ExactSeek - Relevant Search                                           last updated 1/8/17

Search the Web

The content on this website has been painstakingly collated over a period of time and those wishing to have the benefit and
use of information must seek permission to do so and if permission is granted for its use, it must be attributed to the Anti-Docking Alliance.

ADA is a non-funded Organisation and therefore we keep expenses to the minimum.  We do have volunteers who always seem to help out when the call comes. 
Anything we have achieved to date is by way of the help we receive from A.D.A. members, several of our Committee of Honour and other professionals who also
have so kindly donated their time and expertise for which we are extremely grateful. 


JUNE 2017 SCOTLAND - MSPs lifted tail docking ban on working dog breeds (Spaniels
and Hunt, Point, Retrievers) despite fierce opposition from Veterinarians, Welfare
Organizations, and MSPs. 92 % of people who took part in the Government
consultation supported docking of these breeds. The Scottish Government Veterinary
Advisor said an estimate of 80 puppies would have to be docked a year to avoid having
to carry out one amputation on an older dog due to injury.

APRIL 2017 Robert Lees, 52 yr old STOURBRIDGE man, has been ordered to pay nearly £1,000
and complete 100 hours of unpaid work at the house and a 12 month community order when
5 puppies in his house were found to have their tails cut off. He pleaded guilty to five offences
at Wolverhampton Magistrates' Court. An Animal Welfare Officer visited the house after
receipt of information about dog breeding. He found 5 Spaniel puppies that had been docked.
Lees denied being a professional dog breeder and said the litter was unplanned. He said he
had paid £10 each dog to have it done. Lees was unable to prove the pups were docked lawfully.

November 2016 Mr Vincent Connolly, Derry, N. Ireland was sentenced, after pleading guilty to docking the tails
of six springer Spaniel type dogs in his care in and around October 24, 2014. The tails had not been docked by
a certified veterinary surgeon investigations revealed. Mr Connolly was fined £750 and has to pay costs of £169.

March 2015 Coleraine The first prosecution has taken place in Northern Ireland for tail docking.
Edith Burton, 36, of Coleraine was on Friday ordered to do 160 hours of community service and pay £216 in costs
following her conviction. She was also banned from owning, keeping, or participating in keeping of certain dog breeds,
including Jack Russell Terrier types, and Springers or Boxers. She pleaded guilty on March 6 to causing unnecessary
suffering to Boxer puppies in August 2013, and to docking the tails of a previous litter of Boxer-type
puppies in June 2013. Sentencing was put off until Friday while the court awaited a pre-sentence report.
Judge McNally had she pleaded not guilty and then been found guilty by the court she would have been handed
a jail sentence of at least two months. She was prosecuted under the Welfare of Animals Act (NI) 2011
following investigation by Animal Welfare Officers. Coleraine Borough Council said that anyone with concerns
about tail docking should contact their Local Authority’s Welfare Service.

31/10/2014 - A trial date has been set for a restaurateur Ediz Hastulc of Cyprus Restaurant next to Fairways Golf Range,
accused of causing unnecessary suffering to his pet dogs.  He failed to appear at Thames
Magistrates Court on October 20.  He faces one count of failing to prevent the causing of unnecessary
suffering to an animal after his two Rottweiler dogs were injured through the illegal practice known as 'docking'. He denied
tying a band around the tails of the dogs in April.  The RSPCA said that, one of the dogs had lost its tail and
the other was about to lose its tail. Both dogs are now in foster care pending the outcome of the case. Anyone
found guilty of unlawful docking could face up to six months in jail and a fine of £20,000. Hastulc has been released
on unconditional bail to re-appear at Thames Magistrates Court for trial on January 5.

16/4/14 Walter Doe (24) of Uckfield Essex illegally removed a puppy's tail with a sharp instrument. The puppy had to have a
further 2" removed by a Vet as a result. He was sentenced at Hastings Magistrates' Court to 12 weeks imprisonment for
causing unnecessary suffering to the puppy and failing to seek veterinary treatment for his open wound. He was also
banned from keeping any animals for ten years. A RSPCA spokeswoman said the organisation continues to see a
worrying number of cases of dogs being brutalised for cosmetic reasons.

4/14 - Scotland. Gamekeepers' petition to Scottish Government to amend the ban on tail docking for working dogs.
Glasgow University research study has shown that to prevent one tail injury between 81 and 135 Pointer, Spaniel and
Hunt Point Retriever puppies would need to be docked. 4000 Gamekeepers and supporters have signed petition to end docking
ban on working dogs.

16/2/13 - Wandsworth, London, UK. George Williams was sentenced to six months in jail and a life time ban on
keeping dogs. He docked four puppies tails and a Jack Russell Terrier tail.
8/11/12 Hereford - Robert and Susan Kerton bred Rottweiler puppies at their home in Charlton Avenue, Newtown Farm,
Hereford, back in April. “The docking was badly done. The tails were cut too short which is extremely dangerous as it could
cut into the spinal chord.” Mr Kerton, who pleaded guilty to allowing dogs to have their tails docked, claimed a traveller
had come to their house and taken the dogs to Wales to be docked. He claimed he did not pay for docking and has since
given the dogs away to friends and family. Mr Kerton was ordered to carry out 200 hours' unpaid work, while Mrs Kerton
was made the subject of a nine-month community order with supervision and have been banned from keeping animals for
the next 10 years . They were also ordered to pay a total of £821 in costs to cover the court case, vets bills and RSPCA investigation.
24/11/12 Kent - Rachel Harbour, 43, and her son Bill Harbour, aged 20, of Paxhill Close, St Leonards admitted having their
puppies' tails docked illegally at their home and pleaded guilty to having the tails illegally docked from Springer Spaniel
puppies in August. Both were ordered to pay £140 costs each and given a 16-month conditional discharge. Magistrates
heard the family invited someone to their home to dock four of the puppies' tails.
6/10/12 Rochdale - Four neglected pups, thought to be just two months old, were taken to Manchester Dogs' Home after being
found dumped in Rochdale having had their tails illegally docked. They were suffering from a skin condition caused by mites which
led them to scratch off their fur. Staff at the dogs' home, in Harpurhey, believe the pups caught the skin condition after having their
tails cut off.

10/8/2012 Dog dumped in Northfleet with crudely amputated tail

5/2012 RCVS. Disciplinary docking case dismissed
3/2012 Scottish farmer fined for Terrier docking - £500 fine imposed on Scottish farmer
William Fotheringham, 37, after he arranged for Jack Russell Terriers to be docked
Burnley man (26) let Rottweiler puppy suffer for 2 weeks after illegally attempting to dock its tail. He was given a 2 months 7 day
8-20 hrs curfew +£70 costs and banned from keeping animals for 5 years (appealing against this) Also has another court case
pending regarding a dangerous dog.
10/1/12 Derbyshire Times - RSPCA - Seven shivering Jack Russell puppies found in a box in Woking on 5 December.
All had had their tails docked, possibly illegally.
12/11 BVA have issued instructions for Vets when docked dogs are presented. See link
2011 N IRELAND Animale Welfare Act - docking ban - exemption for working dogs
10/11 Wales - Taff Ely couple banned from keeping animals for five years. Jenkins nd Brooks docked their Jack Russell Terrier
in May Jenkins was ordered to do 80 hours unpaid community service and Brooks 120 hours. They also had to pay court costs of £983.

8/7/11 Scotland - Man cut off dog's tail (Rottweiler) Ian Turner, from Lanarkshire, has been banned from keeping animals
for five years.
At Lanark Sheriff Court, Turner admitted between a date unknown and September 2 last year he failed to provide
veterinary treatment to his Rottweiler dog Tyson after the partial removal of his tail. The 27-year-old, from Carnwath near Lanark,
was also sentenced to 180 hours of community service. Turner had allowed someone to dock his dog's tail by trapping it in a door.
It caused the dog a great deal of pain and suffering with an open wound that did not receive veterinary treatment

4/2/11 Bristol -

David Whelan, 36 and Anna Griffin, 32, from Stockwood were found guilty of docking the tails of a litter of Rottweilers last year They
were given a 2 yr conditional discharge and ordered to pay the RSPCA £300 each costs.
15/12/10 Kent - Vet fined for illegally docking tails -
A Deal Vet. escaped disqualification after being
found guilty of illegally docking the tails of 13 Rottweiler puppies. David Smith owner of Lake View Veterinary Surgery, Union Road,
Deal was also found guilty of causing unnecessary suffering when he removed tails of three-day-old pups at his Hawkinge surgery on
March 27, 2008. He denied the charges which were brought by the RSPCA. His lawyer Ann-Marie Gregory said that this had
major implications for vets around the country. See this RCVS link to professional conduct (June 2007):-
in which section 6 states
6.  For the avoidance of any doubt, any instance of tail docking which is found to have been undertaken for reasons which
were not truly therapeutic or prophylactic will necessarily constitute an unacceptable mutilation of the dog, which, if carried
out by a veterinary surgeon who knew or ought to have known of the lack of true justification, would almost certainly be considered
to be conduct disgraceful in a professional respect .'
5/10/2010 Lancashire - A POSTMAN who arranged for four Jack Russell puppies to have their tails docked has been banned from
keeping animals for two years. Andrew Anthony Bennett, 43, of Church Street, Ribchester, pleaded guilty to causing the removal
of part of a dog's tail. He was ordered to pay £1000 costs.

Clare Cozens LLB, 2010. It is with such great sadness that I am reporting the very sudden death of one of our
most supportive members who gave so freely and so much of her time to help with ADA's submission during the
passage of the Animal Welfare Bill through Parliament. Clare will be remembered by so many people for whom she
very willingly and generously gave time and expertise to help. She had a multitude of diverse interests in her life
which made it all the more incredible that she managed to find the time to fit so much in.
This was a culinary example of just one of Clare's many other talents. A valuable life taken all too soon.

clare cake
Our sincere condolences have been sent to her husband and family at this extremely sad time.

JUNE 2010 Study helps clarify tail injuries in dogs Royal Veterinary College Press release issued 25 June 2010
Tail docking is a very emotive subject the world over. A new study will explain the scientific understanding of tail injuries
and tail docking in dogs.
The paper by the Royal Veterinary College ( RVC ) and the University of Bristol seeks to quantify the risk of tail injury, to evaluate
the extent to which docking reduces this risk and to identify other major risk factors of tail injury in a large sample of dogs attending
veterinary practices in Great Britain.
Under recent animal welfare legislation tail docking for dogs has been banned outright for non- therapeutic reasons in England, Scotland
and Wales, although in England and Wales exemptions are allowed for working dogs.
Dr David Brodbelt, Lecturer in Companion Animal Epidemiology at the RVC, explained:
“The practice has always generated strong opinions for and against, many of which are without scientific foundation.”
Key findings from the report include:
Tail injuries requiring veterinary treatment were rare (prevalence of tail injuries was 0.23 per cent, one in 435 dogs).
English Springer Spaniels, Cocker Spaniels, Greyhounds, Lurchers and Whippets were at significantly higher risk when
compared with Labradors and other Retrievers.
The study, also found that, as expected, dogs with docked tails are significantly less likely to receive an injury.
Essentially, approximately 500 dogs (unadjusted for breed) would need to be docked in order to prevent one tail injury.
Professor Sheila Crispin, co-investigator, from the University of Bristol's Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, commented:
“While it is obvious that injury to the tail is impossible if the tail has been removed, the dog may have also lost an important means
of balance and communication.”
The paper, which appears in the 26 June issue of Veterinary Record, is the latest example of effective collaboration between the
RVC's Veterinary Epidemiology and Public Health Group and the University of Bristol's Department of Clinical Veterinary Science.
It was funded by the Welsh Assembly with some support from the Scottish Government and Defra.

JULY 2010 USA Tailed Weimaraners entered at Dog Show
June 2010 Selby Yorkshire. Daniel Thomas Lannen, 32, of Sandwath Drive, Church Fenton, pleaded guilty to removing a dog's tail
for a purpose other than for the animal's medical treatment, and causing unnecessary suffering to five Jack Russell puppies when they
were about two weeks old. The offences took place some time between November 1 and January 13. The defendant's solicitor
told the court that Lannen had not realised that docking dogs' tails was now illegal unless carried out by a vet for health reasons or,
for example, if the animal was to be used as a working dog. Sentencing Lannen, Wendy Bromwich, chairwoman of the bench, told him
he had come extremely close to being jailed. Lannen was given a 16-week night-time curfew, banned from keeping dogs or cats for
ten years
and must pay £889.70 prosecution costs.
April 2010 SCOTLAND Peter Rutherford, 40, of Dalmuir, Clydebank, Dunbartonshire pled guilty to the offence of docking a litter of
Rottweiler puppies at Dumbarton Sheriff Court on Friday (9 April). Rutherford was ordered to pay a fine of £350 and he was banned
from owning or keeping animals for five years. The mother and her pups were signed over to the care of the Scottish SPCA and have
since been rehomed.

11/1/2010 COUPLE BANNED FROM KEEPING ANIMALS FOR 3 YEARS after pleading guilty to docking
the tail of their four-month-old rottweiler puppy .
Fined £280 each £250 each for boarding costs £150 each legal costs and £15 each victim surcharge

see More&Location=None&ProjectID=15576&FromSearc
h=Y&Status=3&Publisher=1&SearchText=tail%20injury&SortString= ProjectCode&SortOrder=Asc&Paging=10#Description
30/10/09 BANNED FROM KEEPING DOGS - Mary Ellen Collis of Wardana Kennels Northants abondoned nearly 100 St
Bernard Dogs in 2008 to go on holiday! She has been disqualified from keeping dogs for 10 years and given a jail sentence of 18 weeks
11/09 DOCKING PROSECUTION - Illegal tail docking - Hutton Cranswick farmer fined for cruelty
Driffield Today - Driffield,England,UK
By Staff Copy Illegal tail docking on dogs will not be tolerated – that is the stark warning sent out by animal welfare officials
after a farmer was ...
SHOWING post April 2007 - In the unlikely event that a puppy is born with no tail or an abnormally short one, the
breeder should obtain a letter from a Vet within days of birth to confirm this so that it can be fully shown in future.
Any dog having its tail shortened for health reasons would only be permitted to be shown where there was no
admission charge to the public and after obtaining Kennel Club permission to show.
CAMBRIDGE 15/8/09 -
Couple end up in dock for docking dogs ' tails
Cambridge Evening News - Cambridge,England,UK
The pair, of New Street, Cambridge, said they did not realise docking a dog's tail was now illegal .
LEICESTER - 17/6/09 - Puppies' tails docked by vet Leicester Mercury - Leicester,England,UK
The legislation bans tail docking unless the animals are of certain breeds or working dogs . He said the animals
involved were a litter of nine Rottweilers ... Harborough magistrates fined Jolaosho £5,000 on each charge.
They ordered him to pay £3,015 costs. Associated to this case, the person who presented the Rottweiler
puppies was convicted of breaching this law and has been banned from selling dogs for life."
BLACKPOOL 2009 - Car parking charges will be made for public entry to the and no gate fee in order for docked
dogs to be shown.
4th MAY 2009 - Ilkeston Derbys. A male Lakeland terrier was found by the Council employed neighbourhood wardens, it
appeared to have had his tail docked illegally. The dog will need an operation to rectify the damaged caused. Docking of tails
has been illegal since the Animal Welfare Act 2006 came into force.
23rd APRIL 2009 - WALES - Barry woman docked Terrier puppy tails "out of ignorance". a man she met in a park
persuaded her it was in the best interest of the dogs for the tails to be docked on her six Jack Russell terrier puppies,
Barry Magistrates gave Beacham – who paid £30 to a “Mr Gill” to have the procedure performed at her home in August 2007
a 24-month conditional discharge and a fine of a total of £260 as she had pleaded guilty. The pups were advertised for free in
a free-ads paper. docked dogs tailsout_of_ignorance/
11/5/09 LEICESTER Humberstone Caroline Hall, 40, of Laburnum Road, Humberstone, admitted at Market
Harborough Magistrates' Court causing and permitting the tails of the Rottweiler puppies to be removed.
Hall has received a life ban from dealing in animals after she admitted arranging to have the tails of nine puppies cut off.
As well as the dealer ban, she was also fined £1,200 and ordered to pay £350 costs and a £15 court surcharge.
April 2009 DOCKING PROSECUTION Harborough. Bad advice from Vet meant that a Dobermann litter
was docked and advertised as "guard dogs". The owners had done their research so the court was told.....
Conditional 2 year discharge and £50 costs each!!!
24 March 2009 - All Party Group for Animal Welfare (APGAW) House of Commons - Short summary given by Pauline Baines,
Founder A.D.A. followed by discussion on loopholes in legislation. These will be forwarded to the DEFRA Minister for consideration.
MARCH 09 Manchester Tail Docker's 2 Year Ban.
Simon Kenyon cut off the tails of Jack Russell puppies. He was also put under supervision for 12 months and ordered to attend a
Think First programme to help prevent him re-offending. and ordered to pay £250 costs.
This is understood to be the first case of its kind in the north west since tail docking was outlawed in England on April 6, 2007.
MARCH 2009 CRUFTS - An Italian Spinone won a Puppy Class with an "abnormally short" tail. The owner said it was
born that way. The dog did not show up on the KC lists of dogs with abnormally short tail requesting and being
given permission to show.
FEB 09 - Nottingham - 8 ROTTWEILER PUPPIES' TAILS Docked With Scissors. Four of the puppies died from shock
and infection to their wounds

FEB 09 Dog breeder loses appeal over Puppy Tail Docking -
Sims was reported as having bred Boxers and Rottweilers
for two years and sold puppies for £450 each. He said: “I spoke to other breeders who said they were still docking tails.
He lost his appeal against conviction on five charges of causing unnecessary suffering but was cleared of failing to keep the
dogs in an appropriate environment. He was given a two-year conditional discharge and ordered to pay £5,000 towards
the RSPCA's costs. Recorder John Hardy QC said: “This court accepts that you are an animal lover who took on too much
with too many dogs at one time. “You were not cruel or sadistic towards the dogs and these offences were as a result of
failing to take action. “The legislation regarding docking is to prevent unnecessary suffering. By definition unnecessary
suffering is caused if docking is performed illegally. “We accept Mr Sims evidence that he was unaware of the full rigour
of the law and that he believed he was not causing unnecessary suffering. “The RSPCA acted entirely correctly and
responsibly in taking the action that they did.” Afterwards his wife was reported to have said she was happy it was
all over and she didn't hold what happened against the RSPCA.

FEB 09 Puppy ' tail dock ' woman walks free
" Tail docking is a cruel practice which was outlawed and the law is widely known in the dog breeding community."
Ms Workman added she was disappointed not to have been awarded the cost of bringing the prosecution, believed to be more ...
This Is Gloucestershire channel feed -
Why did no-one mention in court that it has been illegal since 1991 in force 93  f or a lay person to dock dogs' tails, way before
the Animal Welfare Act.
   Can it really be believed that the defendant who is said to have hunting associations would not have
known this?  Was it reasonable that the defendant was not made liable for the prosecution costs in view that the law had been breached
and that the court costs have to come from charitable donations?  Are all magistrates going to adopt this verdict of
"conditional discharge"  or only those in "certain" areas?
Feb 2009 - KENNEL CLUB PETITION TO GOVERNMENT - The Kennel Club wants support for responsible
dog breeders - see this link for the petition

'.......The Accredited Breeder Scheme is entirely voluntary and the Kennel Club cannot force people to raise their breeding
standards, when required, without government support. This petition is not asking you to join the Accredited Breeder Scheme –
we are asking you to support the basic principles behind it as a way of improving the health and welfare of dogs in the UK and
eventually put puppy farmers out of business.
If, with your assistance, we can gain government support for this proposal, it would mean that anyone breeding a dog would have
to follow responsible standards in order to breed dogs. Anyone not following these standards would then fall outside of the law.
This would be a vital step in the Kennel Club's campaign to ensure that every dog's life is as happy and healthy as it can be. ' end
At present the KC is registering consecutive litters from the same bitch in the same year - this is aperfect concession for puppy
farmers. It has therefore to be ADA's opinion that although breeding regulation is necessary the KC mustl be required to review
this policy to only one litter in a calendar year
.Jan 2009 SCOTLAND -

Extracts of Public Petitions Committee minutes from Tuesday:

PE1230 Petition by Dr Colin Shedden, on behalf of the British Association for Shooting and Conservation, the Scottish Countryside
Alliance, the Scottish Gamekeepers Association and the Scottish Rural Property and Business Association, calling on the
Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to amend the Prohibited Procedures on Protected Animals (Exemptions)
(Scotland) Regulations 2007 to allow prophylactic tail docking of working dogs under tightly specified circumstances.

The Committee agreed to link consideration of this petition with current petition PE1196 on the same issue. …….

PE1196 Petition by Michael Brander calling on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to amend the Animal Health
and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006 as a matter of urgency to allow for the tails of working dogs to be docked.
PE1230 Petition by Dr Colin Shedden, on behalf of the British Association for Shooting and Conservation, the Scottish Countryside
Alliance, the Scottish Gamekeepers Association and the Scottish Rural Property and Business Association, calling on the Scottish
Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to amend the Prohibited Procedures on Protected Animals (Exemptions) (Scotland)
Regulations 2007 to allow prophylactic tail docking of working dogs under tightly specified circumstances.

The Committee agreed to suspend further consideration of both petitions until the study by University of Bristol and the
Royal Veterinary College to document the risks of tail injuries in dogs in the UK, evaluate whether docking of tails
reduces the risk of tail injury and identify other major risk factors for tail injury has concluded and reported. The Scottish
Government will then submit a further response on any bearing this study will have on its policy in this area and whether
it will take the action requested by the petitioner

Docking the tail in the first place is an injury to the dog.

JANUARY 2009 - Cotswolds - Woman may have to work in dog sanctuary after docking puppies' tails
2:54pm Tuesday 27th January 2009 see

9th DECEMBER 2008 Tail-docking shame of street dog-breeder Publication: Western Daily Press
Dold (63) of Seeley Crescent, Street, Somerset, an experienced dog breeder, docked - by banding - two litters of Dobermanns
which subsequently led to
pups requring Veterinary treatment. All dogs were removed into the care of the RSPCA but later three older dogs
were returned. Dold was given 75 days of community service and ordered to pay £2,000 towards prosecution costs. The younger puppies
and their mother were passed into the permanent care of the RSPCA. At a previous hearing, Dold was ordered to pay £8,500 towards
the RSPCA's costs of kennelling the pups.

11th SEPTEMBER 2008 - a docked Cocker Spaniel puppy was presented in a Veterinary clinic. He was purchased
in Dunstable from a Mr Whelan, a "licensed breeder" who registers with the Kennel Club. The dog's owner said
they didn't want a docked dog, didn't realise he had been docked and was under the impression that the Cocker
had been born in Dunstable. The legislation in Ireland still allows docking and it is said thatthe dog had been born
there and transported for sale to England . He may even have been born on a puppy farm. Mr Whelan is of the
opinion that all working dogs should be docked even if going to pet homes. He has many breeding bitches of
different breeds . Mr Whelan has claimed to be an "accredited" breeder - as it is a generic term he can use it
without recourse from the UK Kennel Club on whose list he is not accredited.

August 2008 - If you have a Four Paws pimple ball with a hole through it, DO NOT ALLOW your dog to play with it
as they are exceedingly dangerous and are being recalled by the distributors. The balls should have two holes in them
so that a dog's tongue cannot get sucked in and stuck but some have been faulty with only one hole.

August 2008 - If you have a moment you might like to do this if you have access to the coast from where you live:-
In Parliament, Ian Cawsey MP has tabled an EDM (Early Day Motion) which calls for a Marine Bill to allow
dogs and their owners greater access to the coastline.  Please write to your MP and ask then to sign EDM 1627
The KC has issued it submission on the draft Marine Bill to EFRA Selcect Committee which is currently considering it. 
Since dogs bring about health benefits, reduce our carbon footprint (as long as you are not forced to drive them to a
good and safe walking environment!)and must be exercised to stay healthy, the Marine Bill should increase coastal
access for dog walkers amongst other land users
(but on a lead for safety near cliff edges!!)
"Write to your MP" is a site on the web from which you could do this. Just put in your post code and it should come up
with the correct person

11th July 2008 - HEARTWORM (parasite) has been confirmed in Scotland in a Weimaraner that has not
been out of Glasgow. Symptoms: Coughing, breathing difficulties and unexplained bleeding problems should be treated immediately
as the disease is progressive and fatal.if not treated

A.D.A. needs you to act on any puppy advertisement you see which advertises docked puppies.  Please read below
first and also send a copy to A.D.A. of  any complaint you make to a Local Authority so we can assess the number of
instances where the law appears to be being flouted.
If anyone can give me the contact point of their Local Authority I would be grateful as am endeavouring to build up
index at this link
Local Authorities

Regulations for tail docking were debated in both England and Wales as a part of the Animal Welfare Act 2006, and
these Regulations came into force on 28th March in Wales and 6th April in England.  Under the Regulations,
in England and Wales:

  • The cosmetic docking of dogs is banned .  Therapeutic docking (treatment of illness/injury etc.) is permitted on all dogs
  • There is an exemption for 'working dogs' as defined by the English and Welsh regulations to include those used by the police,
    armed forces, search and rescue, and working gun dogs and dogs used for pest control purposes
    . The breeds covered
    by this exemption can be found below for England and Wales.
  • Only a vet can dock an exempted puppy's tail, he must see the dam of the puppy and he must carry out the procedure before the
    puppy is five days old (although the vet's decision to dock is entirely discretionary).
  • If the vet decides to dock the puppy he must certify that he has seen specific written evidence that the dog is "genuinely
    likely to work"
    in one of the permitted areas and the puppy has to be microchipped.
  • The owner must also make a declaration that the dog is likely to work (a false declaration is an offence).
  • Dogs born after April 2007 A person commits an offence if he shows a dog at an event to which members of the public
    are admitted on payment of a fee (England and Wales),
  • The owner of the dog should have in their possession the legal docking certificate.
    NB 8)
    A person commits an offence if—
    (a) he owns a subsection (3) dog
    , and
    (b) fails to take reasonable steps to secure that
    , before the dog is 3 months old, it is identified as a subsection (3) dog
    in accordance with regulations made by the appropriate national authority .

    Explanatory note:-
    31. Subsection (8) requires a person who owns a dog which was legitimately docked by a Vet to ensure that the dog
    is identified as having been legally docked. The owner will commit an offence if he does not take reasonable steps to
    ensure that his docked dog is so identified

    Subsection (13)(b) allows the appropriate national authority to make regulations about the method of identification
    required, e.g. micro-chipping .

    Anyone seeing an advertisement which does not meet the above criteria should immediately report it with as much evidence
    as possible to the Local Authority in which the breeder lives (search the web for Local Authorities and then
    go to Animal welfare on these sites. They can also be reported to the RSPCA 
    RSPCA cruelty and advice line tel. 0870 55 55 999. or use this link

    This link can help trace telephone numbers in adverts:-

    The Local Authority, the RSPCA and any private individual can bring a case to Court.  If a case is proven expenses can be
    -  The  regulations for truly WORKING dog exemptions as from 6th April 2007
    (although some may be found not to be suitable for work later) are
        TERRIERS and their crossbreeds

        SPANIELS and their crossbreeds 

    This does not apply to dogs bred as pets
    There seems to be a consensus that these regulations must be reviewed between 2 and 5 years.
    also see these relevant DEFRA links:-

WALES -   The list of truly working dog breeds exempted and as amended in the Welsh Plenary as from 28th March 2007
(although some may be found not to be suitable for work later) is now as follows:
     SPANIELS: of only the following breeds will be eligible  English Springer Spaniel;  Welsh Springer Spaniel; Cocker
but not combinations of breeds and 
    TERRIERS of only the following breeds will be eligible Jack Russell Terrier, Cairn Terrier  (normally undocked!)
           Lakeland  Terrier, Norfolk Terrier
- but not combinations of breeds.
  HUNT POINT RETRIEVE breeds remain as originally drafted. Bracco Italiano; Brittany;
German Long-haired  Pointer; German Wire-haired Pointer; Hungarian Vizsla; Hungarian Wire-Haried Vizsla;
Italian Spinone; Spanish Water Dog; Weimaraner; Korthals Griffon; Slovakian Rough-Haired Pointer;
Large Munsterlander; Small Munsterlander.
This does not apply to dogs bred as pets.
Also see this link:

Anyone who is cruel to an animal, or does not provide for its welfare needs, may be banned from owning animals,
fined up to £20,000 and/or sent to prison.

SCOTLAND - The Animal Welfare Act bans certain "mutilations" which includes dog tail docking except
for therapeutic reasons as from 30th April, 2007. 
Scottish Executive:- 'If dogs are to be taken from Scotland for the purpose of having the tails of their
puppies docked, to be then brought back to Scotland for sale, it is likely that the courts would consider
this to be a journey in connection with an economic activity. As a consequence the provision of Council
Regulation (EC) no 1/2005 on the protection of animals during transport would apply. The significance
of this Regulation is that the animals must be "fit to travel" and Chapter 1 of Annex 1 of the Regulation
states that pregnant female for whom 90% or more of the expected gestation period has already passed and
females who have given birth in the previous week are not considered fit for transport. Thus if a dog were to
be taken from Scotland to give birth, she would need to make the journey at least 6 days before the expected
date of the birth and could not be transported back for 7 days following the birth.'END

A review of the legislation may be done later.  We approve of this legislation.    Scotland has not banned the showing
of docked dogs.  
The penalty for docking a dog's tail will be a fine of up to£5,000 and/or six months imprisonment. see this link for
the complete Act:-

N. IRELAND - Still ongoing consultation as at June 2007 but law currently remains as it was pre 2006 i.e only
Veterinary Surgeons can dock. .

adaANIMAL WELFARE ACT - ENGLAND 6th April 2007 - & WALES  27th March 2007

11/07 The Kennel Clubs have said that they will not take part in 'e nforcing the legislation which bans dogs from
certain shows considering that this is a matter for the appropriate authorities .  As a result of the regulation change,
owners of legally docked dogs, docked on or after 6th April 2007 who wish to exhibit at Kennel Club licensed shows
are required to apply for permission to show their dogs.  It should be noted that such dogs are only eligible to be
exhibited in England and Wales at shows which do not charge the public for admission but may be exhibited at all
licensed shows in Scotland and Northern Ireland
. '

3/3/07 - DOCKING OF EXEMPTED DOGS  - Vets will not be forced to dock dogs' that are on the exemption lists on request of the breeders .
The choice will be theirs.  What has to be decided is that, if they do dock, at what length?  Above or below the supra-caudal scent glands, an arbitrary
or by protocol length?

16/2/07  DOCKING REGULATION exemptions FOR ENGLAND (draft)

Wales's ban comes into force 31st March 2007; England's docking ban comes into force on 6th April; Scotland on 30th April 2007.  

The English Regulations we were led to believe were to go through a "Consultation" process. What a waste of everyone's time!  Where, when
and how?! This is certainly not evident as the draft regulations appear to be unchanged from their original format.  
The regulations are
weak and practically unenforceable being mainly left to Local Authorities who can opt out and who will have no extra funding. 
Private prosecutions can be made at the expense of the individual (refundable we are told if case is won!)  Ethical Vets will have the
uneviable task of having to deal with clients trying to bluff them into docking a litter(s).  
From recent discussion it is obvious that there are breeders in Gundogs who will go to any lengths to get litters docked.

No good reasons have been given for still incorporating crossbreeds to the already large list of exemptions and  no central register is to
be kept in order for a paper trail audit.  No DNA testing to be done and there will be weeks apart from the docking procedure and microchipping. 
Evidence as to the dog's likelihood to work can be presented to a Vet from just about anybody. Dogs that weren't docked can now be docked.   
This part of the Act is a total  whitewash and failure to deal with animal welfare which the government likes to proudly boast it does.  We hope
that the Statutory Instruments'
Committee will see just how wrong and difficult these regulations will be to enforce and will send them back for unbiased revisions.  How can
we be sure that those involved with these regulations did not have a vested interest themselves? 
Scotland much to its credit, has got it RIGHT with a total ban with scientific review.   WELL DONE SCOTLAND.

22/12/06 RCVS disciplinary case regarding docking by a Cheltenham Veterinary Surgeon. 15/12/06 - Vet John McKenna has been accused of docking
11 Weimaraner puppies.  He was due to face the RCVS hearing Committee on 12/12/06
Geoff Gill (RCVS) commented It isn't acceptable to hack a chunk of an animal's body off.  If the Vet can prove the animals were intended for
working purposes it may be permitted.  The exception exists to prevent working dogs from damaging their tails when going through bushes and
undergrowth The Vet said that he was told that these dogs MIGHT grow up to become working dogs so I docked their tails.  It isn't illegal to dock
the tails of working dogs.  ....It's something I may only carry out once a year. If someone rang me and asked me to dock the tail of a greyhound
I'd say no." 22/12/06  He was found guilty and was removed from register for 28 days.
In 1995 Marshall Dale was first and last Vet for 11 years to be charged by the RCVS and was acquitted..  Defence costs in excess of £25,000 were met by
the CDB donation

At last the RCVS has acted but the case (RCVS complaints procedure) had to be brought by the breeder herself who apparently claimed that
a puppy died as a result and others got infected stumps.

Since this is the first docking disciplinary action case since 1995 when Marshall Dale was found not guilty on the evidence provided (defence
costs provided by CDB funds in excess of £25,000)  perhaps now they will investigate some of the other Vets who are making a good income
from CDB docking referrals.  However until the RCVS change the complaints procedure which only permits the aggrieved client to lodge a
they are unlikely to be seen proceeding against those Vets on the CDB list.

We are hopeful they will consider changing this when the Veterinary Surgeons' Act comes under review.

USA - Greyhound racing 2008 has been banned in in 6 States since 1993 Massachusetts are voting on a ban and if approved
will go into effect on 1st January 2010
3/3/06 Important RCVS Statement issued today see this link:-
1998>    PAIN - Recent research has shown that neonates are HYPERsensitive rather than HYPOsensitive as has been widely believed.  Neonates have
an intact sensory central nervous system that does not have descending modular pathways that act as pain blocks seen in adults.  Research has also shown
that the memory of neonatal pain can affect the animal in its adult life.  Symptoms include decreased pain threshold, anxiety, social disorders and aggression.  
For FULL details link to:- Pain   See Photos
2005 - AUSTRALIA - because of the connection between cruelty to animals and the abuse of children all suspected cases of cruelty have to be reported .

AUSTRALIA - 4/3/05 Liza Bacchiella of Forrest Beach, Queensland was fined $1000 for docking the tails of 5 Rottweiler puppies between May
and June 2004. A New South Wales man was jailed for 6 months for tail docking but the circumstances were more severe. Vet Dr. Anita Kocsis said
docking was an unethical and cruel practice of cutting the end of the puppy's spine with no anaesthetics; it is like having a finger chopped off.
It is painful to the puppies as they become distressed and whimper

NEW ZEALAND - 5/3/05 Waikato press report. Schnauzer breeder Rose Elle has imported undocked dogs from overseas and has docked tails
of five month old dogs that arrived in New Zealand . Vet Jodi Salinsky regularly sees botched home docking jobs.
The Independent 16/2/05 - extract quote:- Dr. Michael Mendl of Bristol University said that there is an implicit assumption that the more clever
an animal is, the more likely it is to suffer, and he is not sure that there is a clear llink between the two. An accurate assessment of how animals feel,
as well as how they think, is vital to ensure a high standard of animal welfare. However, an animal that is not aware of its thoughts may still be
aware of its feelings and emotions. An awareness of sensations and emotions is known as "feelings consciousness". As far as welfare is concerned,
this is the crux of the matter; what an animals feels, not just what it thinks. Mendl says that animals like us that are clever are more likely to suffer
because they can think about suffering in the future and remember suffering in the past. But they are also capable of understanding that pain is
going to stop. Less intelligent animals may not have this capacity. They may therefore, be worse off because they suffer not knowing their pain
can end.......
Procedures such as tail docking in sheep and branding in cattle are thought to be very painful because animals respond in a way we associate
with pain.
Although feelings are highly subjective; even for those closest to us they are often private experiences. We have no idea what any
animal really feels - physiological studies show that when reacting as if in pain, animals' stress hormones soar. Prof. Dan Weary, from the
University of British Columbia, argues that conventional husbandry methods should be rethought on the basis of the animals' reactions.
In one experiment, half the male piglets on a farm were castrated and the other half were handled as if they were going to be. Only the
pigs who were castrated made high-pitched squeals and only at the time of castration. Some farmers believe that the younger the animal,
the less painful the operation but these pigs squealed no matter what age they were. The experiment indicates that animals' calls are a
good way of assessing their actual pain, rather than the expectation of pain. .... Stress hormones in animals and humans can disrupt memory
you could argue that the ability to process information and store memories is related to conscious experience. On the other hand if pigs have
no consciousness, forgetfulness can lead to damaging behaviour and inefficient husbandry. For example, animals with impaired memories
might attack individuals because they have forgotten they know them. This often happens when sows that have given birth are reunited with
their mates, they often fight vigorously.Prof. Anand is often referenced in pain related animal studies such as tail docking. What follows
can also be associated with animal behaviour:-

Sunday Times 27/2/05 - quote:-'A study of 200 preterm babies found they were subjected to a total of 20,000 procedures in the first 14
days of life in intensive care. Add to this inappropriate stimulation and continuous bright light and you have a model for chronic stress. In
most neonatal units preterm babies lie on their backs on mats, naked apart from a nappy. Grossly immature reflexes mean that their arms
and legs tend to wave or flap which is distressing for the baby, whose every instinct is to curl and ball, seeking safe boundaries to contain him.
..... .....Twenty years ago the notion of stress in preterm infants hadn't even been considered. Tbe pioneering work of of Al Aynsley-Green
and Sunny Anand during the 1980s overturned the widely held belief that babies couldn't feel pain, or if they could, their experience if it
somehow wasn't like ours
. Before this time preterm babies regularly underwent surgery without anaesthesia. "Many of them died from shock"
says Anand, now Professor of Paediatrics and Anaesthesiology at Arkansas Children's Hospital. "Others were returned to the ward, grey
and shut-down, and it would take nurses to stabilise them. Their hormonal stress responses were five times what we expected. We proved
that prolonged elevation of cortisol was incredibly damaging.
" After 48 hours in intensive care, preterm babies have learnt what noxious
stimuli are. When a foot is grabbed for a routine heel prick, they desaturate (oxygen levels go down) and they become unstable, because
they anticipate pain......A host of published studies shows that pain and stress affect brain development and yet the message still isn't getting
.."The collective ego of the medical profession will have to face the fact that their clinical approach is seriously limited" says Anand.
"Do we have a choice? No we don't. It is our duty to practise what is best for the baby."........Where scientists agree that the preterm brain is
very plastic; it develops more between 23 ane 40 weeks' gestation than at any other time throughout life, so sensory experience at this state
is incredibly important....."Research has shown that a mother rocking her baby in her arms has a therapeutic effect on pain management
and growth but rocking a baby mechanically doesn't have the same effect. Why? Because the baby however tiny craves a relationship", explains
Otwin Linderkamp, Prof of Neonatology at the University of Heidleberg Medical School, "Very early on I noticed how tiny babies always
tried to get themselves into a corner in an incubator. The nurses took them back to the middle then the babies tried again. It was very sad this
desperate search for boundaries. When I first came to Heidelberg I found a typical intensive care unit babies lying on mats under bright lights,
and because they were agitated and moved around they were given sedation."
Sunny Anand claims to have the first objective proof that there is conscious processing of painful stimuli by even the most premature babies,
found by looking at responses within the cortex. His paper has been submitted to the New England Journal of Medicine. As the study contains
unpublished information, he is reluctant to reveal the results, but he says this is the definitive study that the developmental care lobby has been
waiting for. "We can now show that repeated painful stimuli produce an increase in the number of cells that die during brain development and
also alter a child's cognitive processing for life. I'm not saying pain is the only problem but we think it is responsible for the long term cognitive
outcomes.... "
JULY 2004 PUPPY BREEDERS  - Essex County Council has invoked the Enterprise Act on a puppy trader at Bailey Kennels to bring her to court for
contravening section 14 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979.  Puppies sold  should be of satisfactory quality and fit for the purpose for which they were intended.  If
she breaks the enforcement order  she will be liable to a fine for contempt of court or even a jail sentence.  This came about as there were complaints  to the
Council about sickly and dying puppies being sold.  This seems to be the first time it has covered the produce of a breeder and not just a single puppy.  
If anyone is buying a puppy from a place where they appear to be puppy farming and the conditions are far from desirable this could be a way of getting it stopped. 
First of all one complains to the local Trading Standards Office  and quote the Enterprise Act.   More details on  
Under Stop Now order it will be seen that the Director of Fair Trading and other consumer bodies  can apply to the courts for “Stop Now” orders  to stop dealers
from breaking laws that harm the interests of consumers in general.  These order also enable consumer bodies to take on dealers for whom existing sanctions are
no deterrent.
2006 - TREVOR COOPER (DANGEROUS DOGS' ACT) - the Solicitor who has successfully defended many dogs under the Dangerous Dogs Act has now set up
a Helpline which covers England and Wales.  0906 515 1108 Mon-Thurs 7.30-9.30 pm.  Calls cost £1 50 pence per minute from BT landline others vary.  For other
information visit his website
 Posted 12/03  PUPPY FARMING WALES AGAIN!!   Please EVERYONE  who visits this site act NOW on Welsh Puppy farming.  Mr. Robert Killick well
known in the dog  world is urging us all to write (especially those of you who live in Wales to your Assembly Member)  (or email) and
 ‘point out the illogical nature
of  funding (taxpayers’ money) the production of more puppies when the NCDL/Dogs’ Trust has had to neuter 5,500 dogs already in 2003, have  removed 792 dogs
to England for re-homing and has spent over £400,000 of charity money this year on the problem of an excess number of dogs.  The Ty-Agored Sanctuary, Wales,
rarely has fewer than 100 dogs in their kennels’   and have been turned down for grants and yet approval is being given  by the Welsh Assembly for grants for
farmers to start up  puppy farms! Wales has double the number of strays per head of population and this is rising. The Co-ordination of Animal Rescue
charities have transferred 1800 dogs from Wales to England in the past 12 months.   Letters please ASAP to Carwyn Jones, Agricultural Minister, Welsh
Assembly, Food and Farming Development Division, Parc Cathays, Cardiff. CF10 3NQ Phone 029 2082 6977, , Cardiff or
email  but use the header Farming or similar ( do not use the word  Puppy Farming as your email may  get trashed!)   Keep it
measured and  polite even if  you cannot believe their crass stupidity in pursuing such schemes .   Christmas is a busy time for everyone but just think of the
real act of goodwill you will be participating in if you can stop the “Puppy Harming” .   The NCDL/Dogs’ Trust, Kennel Club and Robert Killick have all
had unsuccessful attempts to stop these grants and puppy farming.  Now it is up to us, the people,  the ELECTORS,  taxpayers and salary payers of these
Ministers to tell them it has got to stop.   It also needs an immediate Inquiry as to WHY “ they” are persisting with this when there is so much opposition…….
.  These unfortunate dogs/puppies may even end up in foreign countries where they are eaten or stripped alive for their skins.
  Don’t we have enough  dogs
in rescue that need re-homing without adding to the rescue problems?  These puppy farmers won’t be taking their puppies back if sold to undesirable owners
who then decide they no longer want them.  They won’t be checking who buys their puppies and their future welfare.  It is unfair to animal charities and
their donor supporters who have a continuing battle trying to contain the numbers of unwanted dogs.
THE BREEDING OF DOGS ACT  1973 came into force 1/1974.  This Act made it illegal for anyone to keep a  breeding establishment for dogs except 
under the authority provided by a licence.  The definition of a breeding kennel was defined as where more than two bitches were kept for the purpose of
breeding for sale
. The owner of an unlicensed breeding kennel was liable to conviction and a fine not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale.  This was increased
to level 3 under the 1991 Act.  Selling a dog with a false pedigree is a  criminal offence (obtaining money by false pretences).    Eg birth of puppies of a colour
that could not be produced  by the  named parents or an unusually high level of fertility among breeding bitches in a kennel could obtain a conviction. 
If you know of anyone breeding in  abhorrent conditions please contact your local Council with the facts, RSPCA.,  KC., and other agencies such
as Inland Revenue,  Social Security and alert the press.

If you think you have found a puppy farm, get as much information as you such as name of owner, the address, tel numbers etc. If you see local adverts linked to
them, note how many breeds they offer.  Vans coming and going from the premises on a regular basis should have a note of their registration number and time of day seen. 
All details can be given to the Local Authority (keep copies), RSPCA and WAG= Ken McKie Tel 01357 529402  The Local
Authority will be able to tell you if the establishment is licensed.  Ask them when the farm was last inspected and what were the finding and whether there have
been previous complaints.  Push you Local Authority as this is the only way action will be taken and make them more likely to enforce the law. If it has
been your misfortune to have bought a puppy and the puppy is ill or has died contact your local Trading Standards' Office. They should help you get
your money back but there is one drawback if your puppy is still alive and they give a refund you will have to give the puppy back .  Do not get involved with
the puppy farmer directly as they may go to any lengths to protect their lucrative business.  Don't remove pups or trespass as unfortunately the law will
then regard you as the one contravening the law!

3/03 HOUSE OF LORDS BILL 3RD PARTY LIABILITY.  Owners are now liable for injuries to 3rd parties caused by their dogs.    IMPORTANT .  Have you got 3rd
Party Liability Insurance?  Did you know that in March  2003  dog owners are liable for any damage caused by their pets regardless of whether they had been negligent
or not. 
Check your policy out and if you haven’t got one then consider whether you can run the risk of your extremely well-behaved dog tripping someone up on the
flexi-lead… Lifting his leg on someone’s trousers … getting out through the fence into the road and causing an accident …..

The Pressure Group WAG  would like to hear from anyone who has bought from a puppy farm. If you can help in any way,  contact Ken McKie Tel 01357 529402 .  DO PLEASE HELP STOP THIS TRADE.  Your help will be valuable and it costs nothing..
UK DOG  Have you got a group in your area?  If not why not form one?  If you have one and you have a dog, join it.  Access to park and beaches is being gradually stopped by local authorities and by joining this group you will be in a position to negotiate and know what is being planned and halt  further  .    UK Dog have a questionnaire to fill in to help them.  2/04 The Llangrannog Canine Action Group (Wales)  - set up to prevent total dog bans on beaches – needs help.  Email Chris Donnelly  or write Lleifor, Llangrannog, Llandyssul, Ceridigion SA44 6RP

KC Dog Owners Group
The Kennel Club is heartened that the new dog owners group has over 500 participants including many local authorities.  The Kennel Club is currently producing the second quarterly bulletin and in the coming months the Kennel Club will continue to promote the scheme and encourage more dog-owning members of the public and local authorities to join. To join KC Dog, please contact Laura Vallance on or 020 7518 1020.

POSTED 9/03 FIREWORKS  HOORAY!  The Fireworks Bill has passed through Parliament and become law.  Their sale will be restricted and their use to certain times of the day and year and public firework displays will be licensed.  We can but hope that the regulations will be strong enough to enforce.   (Also note site “Soundsscary” for  tapes of unfamiliar sounds to facilitate the introduction of  puppies to domestic life.).  
Posted 10/03  BOO!   There will be a noise level for domestic fireworks but none for category 4, ie professional displays.  There will also be NO restriction on the use of fireworks ALL THE YEAR ROUND.  There will be no restriction on fireworks in categories 1-3  for private displays and they may be let off on private land during any time of the year subject to the landowner’s approval.  There is also to be no restriction on the retail sale of fireworks.  The government has said to restrict fireworks from all the year round use would involve issues of fairness  with regard to religious and cultural minorities… (what about the owners of animals?).   The Bill will not completely ban fireworks; will not limit the noise of fireworks; will not regulate garden fireworks; will not stop anyone letting off fireworks at anytime of the year; will not restrict the selling of fireworks to specialist shops only; will not restrict fireworks to a particular time of the year.  Sleep disturbance –  continuous background noise should not exceed 30dB(A) and individual noise events exceeding 45dB(A) should be avoided.  Hearing damage can result from exposure short term of 120dB(A)..  Animal hearing is far more sensitive than humans.  Some fireworks are  120dB(A); normal conversation is 60dB(A)  Firework Petitions available from Morris at Banbury 01295 255068
2005 MICROCHIPPING & RE-UNIFICATION -  If the ownership of a microchipped animal is in doubt and a client presents at a Vets.'with an animal that has a microchip registered in another person's name, both parties, with mutual consent, can be put in touch with each other.  However, if the client declines to consent to the release of his or her name and contact details, the new RCVS guidance states that a Veterinary Surgeon may pass these details to the Petlog Re-unification Service. If the client is not willing for their details to be released or refuse to agree to return the animal they will be informed that the registered owner will be advised to seek legal advice/ On instruction from a Solicitor or the Police, Petlog can release details.  Owners are recommended  to ensure that they update their personal details with the Petlog Reunification Service if they move house or change telephone number.
DOG WARDENS  There is a list  on the Luton Borough Council’s website  see A-Z Services; click on to Dog Wardens and you will find Dial a Dog Warden UK listing telephone numbers for all Dog Wardens in the UK:-   If you need a paper copy contact the Council’s Dog Warden Service, Luton Town Hall, Upper George Street,  Luton LU1 2BQ Tel 01582 546168/546613 or  minicom 01582 724013COULD A DOG WARDEN TRACK YOU DOWN IF YOUR PET STRAYS?  KEEP YOUR DETAILS UP TO DATE ONLINE NOW!   If your pet is microchipped and registered with Petlog, they need to be able  to contact you at the earliest opportunity should the worst happen and you  lose your pet.  Click here to update your details online now!
LOST OR FOUND A PETThere is a new 24-hour PetBack Central Hotline which works with over 10,000 pet care organisations and provides 2 services for the owner.  PetBack Protect offers FREE one year of optional lifetime protection for a pet which includes a pet ID tag linked into a 24 hour lost and found service, free microchip registration and should the pet go missing, immediate free transfer of the pet’s details to PetBack Response.  Cost:  1 year free – lifetime £14.95
PetBack Response -  can be actioned  on the spot if a pet goes missing.  The pet’s photo and details will be transferred into the missing pets’ register supported by an electronic notification to charities such as the RSPCA, Battersea Dogs’ Home etc.  Cost: PetBack Protect Members free.  Non-members £19.95.  PetBack Central is 24 hr hotline run by Missing Pets Bureau  Tel 0870 1 999 999   Claims to work with 10,000 pet care organisations, Can provide 1 year optional lifetime protection for pets which includes ID tag linked to 24 hour lost and found service, free microchip registration.   Owners can also choose PetBack Notify where details of missing pets are sent out (including a photograph) on a highly targeted basis to vets, rescue centres, dog wardens and police stations in the area that the pet went missing – Tel 0870 1 6000 999 Cost from £16.95 including first class postage
Missing Pets Bureau membership enquiries 0870 1600 999 or 0800 231 6090
DOG THEFT This is becoming a major problem.  It has been reported in the dog press that around 135,000 dogs (900 puppies every week***) go missing annually and it's on the increase!) Dogs are being stolen from gardens and cars (sometimes for ransom money).  There appears to be little or no policing of this and people affected are having to rely on their own resourcefulness to find the whereabouts of their dogs, often without success.  Certain areas have been well targeted such as Kent and Essex but it has spread throughout the country.  Police report dogs as “ missing”  – not stolen – as they say they only do that if thieves have been seen to take the dogs (perhaps it's the same for house burglaries…!)  Please be watchful for your dog and others.   Do not leave your dog alone in the garden, outside shops and be wary of strangers calling or coming up expressing an interest in your dog,  Take details of puppies for sale at car boot sales and report if necessary to police and RSPCA asap.  According to the MISSING PET BUREAU, dog breeds most at risk from theft are:-  English Springer Spaniels, Border Terriers, Boxers, Yorkshire Terriers, Labrador Retrievers
***nationally reported statistics are not available
Also:-  shows pictures of lost dogs.  Small fee for  faxed details of missing dog to all Vets within 10-20 miles’ radius.  Leeds is apparently terrible for dog theft as is south of Doncaster. DOG THEFT ACTION STARTED 2005 to cordinate all resources and lobby government. They are asking every dog owner to write to their MP asking for a better response to dog theft.
Lost Dogs’ Line run by Battersea Dogs’ Home within M25 area.  Lines are open 8am-8pm 365 days a year.  Calls 60p a min. Tel 0901 477 8477 is free and lists lost and found pets in the UK and Eire http://www.petsearch(uk)  is free and reports lost or found animals; the most recent are displayed first.    Lurcher Search aims to re-unite lost lurchers and running dogs with their owners.  Operated by countrywide volunteers and details circulated to dog wardens, rescue centres, police etc
Posted 6/05 DOG THEFT - it has been reported in the dog press that 40% of dogs stolen are Staffordshire Bull Terriers.
Posted 2/04 DOG THEFT is back in the news.  Watch out!     Thefts also in Midlands, Wolverhampton  and Walsall and Warwickshire.  Don’t leave your pedigree dogs unguarded in the garden, in the car or tied up outside a shop.  The Home Office apparently still do not consider  this to be a widespread problem!  If you have had a dog stolen, please write to them. 2,500 dogs go “missing” every week!  Also make sure your dog is microchipped/tattoed.  All breeders please ensure your litters are microchipped/tattoed.
Microchip/tattoo your dogs.   Make sure your gardens are secure. Do not put stickers on your car advertising your dog or leave empty cages inside.   Do  not leave dogs unattended in gardens, cars or at shows or on benches at shows.  Don’t let your dog run out of sight at exercise especially in a public park.  Keep runs and kennels locked.  A  thorny hedge is a useful boundary to gardens.  Get an alarm system – garage ones are cheap and easy to install.  Don’t advertise your address if selling puppies.   Don’t signpost kennels.   Take note of strangers who comment on your dogs, make a note of suspicious car numbers  if you feel your premises are being watched.   If you’re really concerned inform the police of your suspicions and other dog owners etc.   If someone comes to see puppies, get their address and  take a photo ‘say it will be a nice memento for them when they collect puppy’.   Question them closely and check their answers with other breeders.  Don’t allow puppies to be taken away by any unexpected callers.  If you have enquiries over the ‘phone, take only land line numbers and ‘phone them back. Treat all unexpected visitors with suspicion – don’t allow them on the premises and make a note of car numbers and watch any other occupants of the car.   Canine society meetings and training classes are useful as a neighbourhood watch to collect and collate information and if you can persuade the police to take an interest so much the better.    Monitor enquiries and unusual interest.  When selling puppies always get the address of new home and don’t give them registration and papers but send them to the address given and explain to purchasers why you are disregarding the Kennel Club recommendations in this instance.  If you are unable to supply puppies do not pass the enquirer on to some one; ask the other breeder to contact them.
2003 PETLOG MICROCHIPS -  If your dog had a microchip supplied by PETtrac (California)  but registered with PETLog you may find you are no longer on PETLog register as last year PETtrac (  removed the details of all pets with a PETtrac chip.  PETtrac has been found wanting insofar as it does not have a 24 hour or 7 days a week service.  If you are not sure whether your pet has a PETtrac chip (your original certificate will have Pettrac’s name on it) or if you have no certificate then you should get the number checked.  If it starts with a 1(one) and ends with an  A  or starts with either 977 or 250 then it is probably a PETtrac chip and PetLog have said as a goodwill gesture they will restore your details on their data base but you must write with the full identification number and full details of the pet to PetLog, PO Box 263, Aylesbury. HP19 8ZH or email from the website
2003 RCVS & PETLOG  At last the RCVS has revised their stance with regard to microchips and dogs with “wrongful” owners.   Before if a Vet was presented with an animal which was microchipped in another person’s name,  both parties could be put in touch BUT only by mutual consent.  Now it is agreed  before applications for registrations can be considered.d by the RCVS  that if  no consent is given  by one client to release their details or to return the animal,  the new  guidance states that a Vet. may pass these details to the Petlog Reunification Service.  The client will be informed by Petlog that the registered owner will be adsvised to seek legal advice.  On instruction from a solicitor or the police, Petlog can release details.  Please ensure that all your details including tel. No.  are registered correctly and are up-to-date with Petlog Reunification Service
2004 Irish Kennel Club - Microchipping. From 1/1/2006 the Irish Kennele Club will require all puppies to be microchipped
BANNED FOR LIFE as a result of burglary.   Woman from Gt. Manchester was banned from keeping animals for life,  and had a community service order of 100 hours and had to pay £250 costs when burglars tipped off the RSPCA about her filthy and  neglected dog.  She admitted causing unnecessary suffering
7/03 USA – Alabama.  GREYHOUND CULLING  The Alabam Legislature are legalising the culling of Greyhounds by ANY person.  Greyhounds are to be classified as livestock.    The Bill (37) has been passed in the House by a Tourism and Travel Committee and in the Senate under a Tourism and Marketing Committee.  All members of the Mobile and Baldwin Legislative Delegations voted for the Bill except 3 who were not there when the bill was voted on.  The Governor has offered no explanation or justification  for this vicious law.  To register protest
To add to the international appeal for support being collated by a local TV reporter, Randy Wood, email
2003 PHOTOS:     I still need good clear photos of the following undocked (docked) breeds for the website.  If you know anyone in your area with one of the following undocked versions of these docked breeds, please ask them to get in touch with me with a photo:Brittany Spaniel; ; Field Spaniel;  Lakeland Terrier;     Pinscher.
HYGIENE Regulations 2006 - No specific mention is made of  dogs being admitted to food or other premises.  However food establishments have to maintain hygiene standards and how they do that is left to the individual and a risk assessment.  They are not compelled to ban dogs but can use the regulations as an excuse to do so and it is entirely at their own discretion.
 2001? COMPANION DOG CLUB  has been started by the Kennel Club for non-pedigree dogs.  Cross breeds have been part of The Kennel Club’s registration scheme for over 50 years catering for dogs in Agility, Obedience and Working Trials.  There is a membership certificate which will entitle members to special offers in the newsletter.  There is an accident emergency card, newsletter and ID tag and car sticker.  The car sticker is very appealing but, GUESS WHAT, the non-pedigree Jack Russell it portrays is docked.  If any of you join the Club **PLEASE, PLEASE remonstrate with the Kennel Club for using a docked dog’s picture on this sticker.    The registration fee is £10 and details can be obtained from The Kennel Club - Companion Dog Club, 4a Alton House,  Alton House Office Park, Gatehouse Way.  Bucks. HP19 8XU Can also be found on  
LEARNING TO UNDERSTAND YOUR DOG  CD-Rom course on offer by the University of Edinburgh see website for details of cost etc.  
SPINNER of dog/cat/rabbit COMBINGS - Pam Gardner. Contact ADA for details!·

Quotes  on judges at dog shows:-

‘The time he takes to judge a breed is directly related to the endurance of his bladder’.’‘After being judged a woman asked the judge what he thought of her Staffie, he said, I don’t know anything about the breed, I always give it to the handler with the biggest tattoos, that way I don’t get attacked on my way home!

HORSE, DOG AND MAN poem by S E Kiser
The horse and the dog had tamed a man and fastened him to a fence:
Said the horse to the dog: "For the life of me, I don't see a bit of sense
In letting him have the thumbs that grow at the sides of his hands. Do you?"
And the dog looked solemn and shook his head, and said: "I'm a goat if I do!"

The poor man groaned and tried to get loose, and sadly he begged them, "Stay!
You will rob me of things for which I have use by cutting my thumbs away!
You will spoil my looks, you will cause me pain; ah, why would you treat me so?
As I am, God made me, and He knows best! Oh, masters, pray let me go!"

The dog laughed out, and the horse replied, "Oh, the cutting won't hurt you, see?
We'll have a hot iron to clap right on, as you did in your docking of me!
God gave you your thumbs and all, but still, the Creator, you know, may fail
To do the artistic thing, as he did in the furnishing me with a tail."

So they bound the man and cut off his thumbs, and were deaf to his pitiful cries,
And they seared the stumps, and they viewed their work through happy and dazzled eyes.
"How trim he appears," the horse exclaimed, "since his awkward thumbs are gone!
For the life of me I cannot see why the Lord ever put them on!"

"Still it seems to me," the dog replied, "that there's something else to do;
His ears look rather too long for me, and how do they look to you?"
The man cried out: "Oh, spare my ears! God fashioned them as you see,
And if you apply your knife to them, you'll surely disfigure me."

"But you didn't disfigure me, you know," the dog decisively said,
"When you bound me fast and trimmed my ears down close to the top of my head!"
So they let him moan and they let him groan while they cropped his ears away,
And they praised his looks when they let him up, and proud indeed were they.

But that was years and years ago, in an unenlightened age!
Such things are ended, now, you know; we've reached a higher stage.
The ears and thumbs God gave to man are his to keep and wear,
And the cruel horse and dog look on, and never appear to care.
 ‘IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF THE WORLD THERE IS BUT ONE THING THAT MONEY CANNOT BUY - TO WHIT, THE WAG OF A DOG’S TAIL’ Henry Wheeler Shaw 1818-1885 (quoted in the KC Crufts’ 2003 schedule!!!)
‘DOGS LAUGH, BUT THEY LAUGH WITH THEIR TAILS’ – Max Eastman American writer and poet 1883-1969 ‘DOGS  CRY –  but THEY CRY WITH THEIR TAILS’  Anon
 ‘He is your friend, your partner, your defender, your dog.  You are his life, his love, his leader.  He will be yours, faithful and true, to the last beat of his heart.  You owe it to him to be worthy of such devotion.’ – Anonymous
‘Histories are more full of examples of the fidelity of dogs than of friends.’ – Alexander Pope
‘Dogs are our link to paradise.  They don’t know evil or jealousy or discontent.  To sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring – it was peace.’ – Milan Kundera<

Golden Retriever: The sun is shining, the day is young, we've got our whole lives ahead of us, and you're inside worrying about a stupid burned out bulb?
Border Collie: Just one. And then I'll replace any wiring that's not up to code. Dachshund: You know I can't reach that stupid lamp! Rottweiler: Make me. Boxer: Who cares? I can still play with my squeaky toys in the dark.
Lab: Oh, me, me!!!!! Pleeeeeeeeeze let me change the light bulb! Can I? Can I? Huh? Huh? Huh? Can I? Pleeeeeeeeeze, please, please, please! German Shepherd: I'll change it as soon as I've led these people from the dark, check to make sure I haven't missed any, and make one more perimeter patrol to see that no one has tried to take advantage of the situation. Jack Russell Terrier: I'll just pop it in while I'm bouncing off the walls and furniture.
Old English Sheep Dog: Light bulb? I'm sorry, but I don't see a light bulb
Cocker Spaniel: Why change it? I can still pee on the carpet in the dark. Chihuahua: Yo quiero Taco Bulb. Pointer: I see it, there it is, there it is, right there, see it, right there... Greyhound: It isn't moving. Who cares?
Shetland Shepherd
: First, I'll put all the light bulbs in a little circle...
Poodle: I'll just blow in the Border Collie's ear and he'll do it. By the time he finishes rewiring the house, my nails will be dry. The Cat: "Dogs do not change light bulbs. People change light bulbs. So, the real question is: How long will it be before I can expect some light, some dinner, and a massage?"  


The Campaign Against the Docking of Dogs' Tails

  <!-- START OF ADDME LINK --><a ref=""><img src="" alt="Search Engine Submission, Internet Marketing, Site Traffic and Optimization" width="88" height="31" border="0"></a> <!-- END OF ADDME LINK -->

 <a href=""><font face="Verdana,Arial" size="2">Click Here to                        Search This Site</font></a>




This Website requires a Browser capable of processing Javascript


- This site best viewed in resolution 1024 x 768 -

Copyright 2001 ADA The Anti-Docking Alliance . All Rights Reserved.
Legal Notices | Reprints Permissions | Privacy Policy

Web Design by Animates & Anti-Docking Alliance


 <TITLE>Anti-Docking Alliance</TITLE><META NAME="Description" CONTENT="We seek government legislation to ban the non-therapeutic docking of dogs' tails, cropping of ears and dew claw removal by lay persons"><META NAME="Keywords" CONTENT="dogs tails, docking, undocked, docked, tail standards, dog Vets, dog breeds, Veterinarians, docked breeds, tailless,">  <A HREF="" TARGET="_blank">META Tag Help</A><!-- Begin Add Me! link --> <a href=""><img src=""          alt=", search engine submission and optimization" width="88" height="31" border="0"></a> <!-- End          Add Me! link --><SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript1.1" SRC=""></SCRIPT>